Back to Blog
IT/OT & Operational Continuity

Fewer office manuals and more factory floor: what we learned transforming 14 industrial data centres across Europe

Fewer office manuals and more factory floor: what we learned transforming 14 industrial data centres across Europe
2 min read

If you search online for how to transform a data centre, you will find dozens of well-structured guides. They cover methodologies, project phases, migration plans and best practices. They are useful and necessary.

But there is one reality that barely appears in those documents: what happens when that transformation has to be carried out while a plant keeps producing.

In an industrial environment there are no ideal scenarios. There are production lines that cannot stop, maintenance windows that change within minutes, multidisciplinary teams that must coordinate precisely and decisions that have to be made on the ground.

At MOTUM Technologies we have just completed the transformation of the infrastructure and data centres of 14 production plants across Europe. A project that took us thousands of kilometres, working side by side with plant teams, and confirmed that field experience is still the greatest asset in this kind of project.

A few figures help to put it in perspective:

  • More than 20,000 kilometres flown coordinating teams and architectures in different countries.

  • More than 12,000 kilometres by road connecting plants, logistics centres and substations.

  • More than 100 hotel nights, because production does not care about schedules or weekends.

But the real value of the project is not in the kilometres travelled, but in the lessons it leaves behind.

Three things you only learn when the project leaves PowerPoint and enters the factory

1. Maintenance windows exist... until production shows up

In corporate infrastructure it is possible to plan a shutdown weeks in advance.

In an industrial plant, the priority is always to produce.

That requires resilient architectures, extremely detailed procedures and contingency plans that can adapt to last-minute changes. Technology must fit into the operation, not the other way round.

2. IT and OT do not speak different languages. They have different priorities.

One of the biggest challenges in any industrial transformation is not technological, but human. IT teams look for availability, security and standardisation.

Operations teams need to make sure production continues without interruption.

Success comes when both stop working as separate departments and start sharing the same goal.

Technology connects systems. People make the project possible.

3. Logistics is also part of the engineering

When a rollout involves multiple plants spread across different countries, planning stops being an administrative task and becomes a critical part of the project.

Every tool, every component, every procedure and every fallback plan must be ready before the intervention starts.

Because, on the ground, a small detail can hold up the work of an entire team.

Experience cannot be improvised

Every project brings technical knowledge.

But it also teaches something more important: the difference between knowing a methodology and having applied it in real conditions.

Transforming critical infrastructure in industrial environments requires combining technology architecture, cybersecurity, automation, planning capability and constant communication with plant teams.

That balance can only be achieved by building up experience.

After travelling thousands of kilometres and completing this international project, we came back with an even firmer conviction: in industrial environments, technical excellence is essential, but trust is built on the ground.

Because the best infrastructures are not the ones that look best on a slide.

They are the ones that keep working while everything changes around them.

Frequently asked questions

The transformation must be designed around the plant's operation. This means working with resilient architectures, controlled maintenance windows, detailed procedures, backup systems and contingency plans. The goal is to modernise the technology infrastructure while minimising the impact on production processes and guaranteeing operational continuity.

The main difference is the direct dependency between technology and production. In an industrial environment, an incident in the IT infrastructure can affect OT systems, manufacturing lines, logistics processes or critical facilities. That is why planning must take into account both the technology requirements and the operational needs of each plant.

IT/OT integration coordinates the corporate technology infrastructure with the systems that support industrial operations. IT usually prioritises availability, security, standardisation and information management, while OT's priority is keeping production processes running safely and continuously. An effective industrial transformation must reconcile both goals.

Because real conditions in a plant can change quickly. A maintenance window may be shortened, production may change its schedule or technical constraints that were not initially foreseen may appear. Experience makes it possible to take decisions on the ground without compromising security, the infrastructure or the continuity of operations.

A multi-country project requires a common methodology that can adapt to the characteristics of each site. Architectures, technical teams, materials, logistics, procedures, intervention windows and contingency plans all have to be coordinated. Standardisation makes the rollout easier, but each plant must be treated according to its operational reality.

Because having the right component, tool or resource at the moment of an intervention can determine the success of the project. When multiple plants and countries are involved, logistics becomes part of the project's engineering. Equipment, spare parts, travel, staff and alternatives must be coordinated before each intervention begins.

It is an architecture designed to keep critical technology services available even when failures, maintenance work or infrastructure changes occur. It can include redundancy, backup systems, segmentation, monitoring and recovery procedures to reduce the impact of possible incidents on production.

The main risks include production interruptions, compatibility problems between new and existing systems, failures during migrations, unidentified dependencies, cybersecurity vulnerabilities and coordination difficulties between IT, OT, operations and suppliers. Detailed planning makes it possible to anticipate and reduce these risks.

Modernising an industrial infrastructure must build cybersecurity in from the design stage. The convergence of IT and OT increases connectivity between systems and can widen the attack surface. That is why segmentation, access control, monitoring, system updates and the protection of critical assets must be part of the project.

Through a combination of prior analysis, documented procedures, testing, redundancy, backups, rollback plans and contingencies. It is also essential to coordinate each intervention with the IT, OT and production managers to know which systems can be changed and when.

Yes, although standardisation must allow a degree of local adaptation. Defining common architectures, technologies and procedures simplifies administration, improves security and makes maintenance easier. However, each plant may have its own particularities related to machinery, legacy systems, production or existing infrastructure.

The project confirmed three main lessons: maintenance windows must adapt to the real needs of production; IT and OT do not pursue opposing goals, but different priorities that must be coordinated; and logistics is part of the engineering when working on geographically distributed industrial projects.

MOTUM Technologies completed the transformation of the infrastructure and data centres of 14 production plants across Europe. The project involved more than 20,000 kilometres by air, 12,000 kilometres by road and more than 100 hotel nights, as well as coordinating teams, architectures and operations in different countries.

It requires combining technology architecture, IT/OT knowledge, cybersecurity, automation, project management, logistics and the ability to respond on the ground. It also demands continuous communication between technology specialists, plant managers, operations and other teams involved.

Success is not just about rolling out a new technology. A transformation is effective when it improves the infrastructure, increases its resilience and security and, at the same time, respects the needs of the operation. In industrial environments, the best infrastructure is the one that can evolve without compromising the continuity of production.